tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post771802852877774158..comments2023-10-22T22:09:30.735-05:00Comments on A Love for Art: Oops-- St. Buddha?!!!D.Macrihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16015231384680673802noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post-37883458667545265282009-08-16T11:24:00.589-05:002009-08-16T11:24:00.589-05:00the name of the painting is at the top of this pos...the name of the painting is at the top of this post.<br /><br />i got it from some random dude's flickr page. no idea how or where he got hold of the image.Lorne Robertshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07193001944115624092noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post-90222063722826763142009-08-15T16:19:24.269-05:002009-08-15T16:19:24.269-05:00How about a title? Where did you get this image.
...How about a title? Where did you get this image.<br /><br />Maybe helpful idea:<br /><br />http://www.alifetimeofcolor.com/study/timeline.htmlD.Macrihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16015231384680673802noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post-35124710095151199392009-08-15T15:52:29.448-05:002009-08-15T15:52:29.448-05:00i feel like these pre-renaissance works were usual...i feel like these pre-renaissance works were usually anon, or by like "master of tours" or whatever.<br /><br />the name in the bottom right is the name of iosapha, not the artist, alas.Lorne Robertshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07193001944115624092noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post-75963794178628522002009-08-15T15:17:16.660-05:002009-08-15T15:17:16.660-05:00I mean, I can't decipher the handwriting, not ...I mean, I can't decipher the handwriting, not that I'm illiterate =P.D.Macrihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16015231384680673802noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post-3004627272581594182009-08-15T15:15:59.837-05:002009-08-15T15:15:59.837-05:00Yea! You guys hate anonymous eh?
I just hit the wr...Yea! You guys hate anonymous eh?<br />I just hit the wrong button instead of loggin. My comment wasn't meant to be dickhead-ish. Just the easiest way to pinpoint the year it was made is with the artists name, which is on the painting (but I can't read).D.Macrihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16015231384680673802noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post-2103378794160565702009-08-15T15:07:53.222-05:002009-08-15T15:07:53.222-05:00Oh was that you?Oh was that you?c-dognoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post-30285353860190936912009-08-15T15:07:03.525-05:002009-08-15T15:07:03.525-05:00What the fuck is wrong with you? Why would you cal...What the fuck is wrong with you? Why would you call me a dickhead for suggesting a way to answer your question. (and there ARE people alive who make old looking Christian art).D.Macrihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16015231384680673802noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post-56871574251285531902009-08-15T14:54:52.108-05:002009-08-15T14:54:52.108-05:00Yet it likely wasn't d-ckhead.Yet it likely wasn't d-ckhead.c-dognoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post-88389062684092047672009-08-15T14:50:49.045-05:002009-08-15T14:50:49.045-05:00If we don't know who the artist is, it could h...If we don't know who the artist is, it could have been completed last week.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post-84127879125356963552009-08-15T11:52:24.231-05:002009-08-15T11:52:24.231-05:00How to confirm?How to confirm?c-dognoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post-27355711877044439982009-08-15T11:48:34.725-05:002009-08-15T11:48:34.725-05:00hmmmm... although, looking at his earliest works, ...hmmmm... although, looking at his earliest works, they're not all that different from this one, so...<br /><br /><br />1380 to 1455, and anyone who disagrees with that is an unregenerate art heretic.Lorne Robertshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07193001944115624092noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post-10601564433381448622009-08-15T11:45:21.237-05:002009-08-15T11:45:21.237-05:001480 is way too late, i think, when you consider t...1480 is way too late, i think, when you consider that da vinci was already working around that time. i feel like the perspective/scale is sort of pre-renaissance.<br /><br />1350 to 1410?Lorne Robertshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07193001944115624092noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post-36326195117947799552009-08-15T11:42:10.140-05:002009-08-15T11:42:10.140-05:00Not too wide, I produced the same range, heh, but ...Not too wide, I produced the same range, heh, but too early still.c-dognoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post-91826796627305477102009-08-15T11:38:29.645-05:002009-08-15T11:38:29.645-05:00I think that's still a bit too wide. I'm t...I think that's still a bit too wide. I'm thinking more 1350 to 1480.c-dognoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post-24971287957008255162009-08-15T11:33:38.129-05:002009-08-15T11:33:38.129-05:00hmmmm, you might be right. somewhere between, lik...hmmmm, you might be right. somewhere between, like, 1280 and 1410, let's say?Lorne Robertshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07193001944115624092noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11186098.post-26340573480404357582009-08-15T11:18:29.594-05:002009-08-15T11:18:29.594-05:00Nice!
I think the painting would be more 14th to ...Nice!<br /><br />I think the painting would be more 14th to early 15th Century.<br /><br />Way to school me on a Saturday AM too, nice.c-dognoreply@blogger.com