a race of intelligent extraterrestrial beings visited and/or colonised Earth in the remote past, whereupon they upgraded the primitive hominid Homo erectus by means of genetic engineering to create the human race as we know it: Homo sapiens.
Evidence for this idea is found (a) in the improbability of Homo sapiens emerging so suddenly, according to the principles of orthodox Darwinism; and (b) in the myths of ancient civilisations which describe human-like gods coming down from the heavens and creating mankind 'in their own image'.Homo sapiens is thus regarded as a hybrid being, incorporating a mix of terrestrial genes from Homo erectus and extraterrestrial genes from an ascribed "race of the gods".
Prior to the modern age of space travel and genetics, this theory for the origins of humankind could not have been conceived. And even now, in the 21st century, there are many people who would regard it as science fiction. However, in the light of the problems with the orthodox theory of human evolution, the idea of a genetic intervention by an intelligent human-like species (who themselves evolved on another planet over a more credible time frame) does require to be taken seriously as a potential solution to the mystery.
In a 1998 interview, Clifford Stone, a retired U.S. army Sergeant who served in the U.S. Army for 22 years and allegedly participated in operations to retrieve crashed extraterrestrial ships and extraterrestrial biological entities (EBE's), revealed there were a variety of extraterrestrial races known [by various institutions and agencies]". undamentalist messages in from Christianity to Judaism to Islam, and other institutionalized religions, as well as outright apparent 'cult' groups, have been specifically placed by "hostile elements" to manipulate and control humankind. There is startling evidence from a number of independent sources that 'human looking' extraterrestrial visitors have integrated with and lived in major population centres up until recently, and this is known by a select number of institutions. These "Human extraterrestrial visitors" have been represented has often having as very attractive physical characteristics, with "Human extraterrestrial females" being described as among the most beautiful women that male observers have witnessed.
13 comments:
oh yeah. love it. i'm into extraterrestrialism except for
A: the theory's insistence on humankind somehow being superior, or weirdly and inexplicably "better" than everything else, so that we need to devise a theory to explain why we're so much better (that sounds like religion talk to me). we're not better or more advanced. we're just differently advanced. for e.g., try to survive a week outdoors at -40 celsius. we can find ways to identify and describe the world around us, ways that other earthly beings have perhaps not accessed, but other earthly beings have access to knowledge that is vastly beyond us.
for e.g. why did almost very few animals die in 2005's tsunami, while hundreds of thousands of humans did? because they understand the workings of the planet in a way that we don't, and moved to higher ground well in advance.
B: of course there's life out there somewhere, somehow, in some form we may or may not be able to understand, and to think otherwise is (in my opinion) silly and anthropocentric.
C: the more we know about things in general, the more we realize we know nothing much, really, so conclusive viewpoints are always problematic at their very core (like this one that i'm expressing right now, for e.g.)
D: the all-encompassing vaugeness of any conspiracy theory. "there are startling pieces of evidence", or "it has often been reported" simply don't work as support for an arguement.
i like this stuff though, captain goldman. keep it comin', please, and i'll keep bickering with you on it.
You're exactly right. I certainly don't claim to know the truth. But I find it an extremely usefull excercise to analyse all sides no matter how far fetched. In fact, that's the over all method Im following in order to find a state of no mind. No opinion.
The goal of course is raw wonder. Like a child who has no answers, no truth.
As to your points:
A. we're not better. But definately different and seperate. Like on sesame street which of these things is not like the other. We're the hammer amongst fruit.
B. Interesting how the article mentioned that aliens sometimes come in the form of beautiful ladies.
C. Exactly, the funnest is having no viewpoint. From this point you can take any side just for the fun of it. Pick the side that's losing, the side that is underexposed.
D. When you don't have an opinion, how can you make an argument? You don't, instead you just spread information creatively.
Love it!
To say that having no opinions is useful is an opinion in itself. The only way to have no opinions is to be dead.
And that's my opinion about having opinions.
Don't worry folks. The truth is here and it is green.
The Emerald Tablet, also known as Smaragdine Table, Tabula Smaragdina, or The Secret of Hermes States according to the:
translation, by Isaac Newton, found among his alchemical papers:
1. Tis true without lying, certain & most true.
2. That which is below is like that which is above & that which is above is like that which is below to do the miracles of one only thing.
3. And as all things have been & arose from one by the meditation of one: so all things have their birth from this one thing by adaptation.
4. The Sun is its father, the moon its mother,
5. The wind hath carried it in its belly, the earth its nurse.
6. The father of all perfection in the whole world is here.
7. Its force or power is entire if it be converted into earth.
7a. Separate thou the earth from the fire, the subtle from the gross sweetly with great industry.
8. It ascends from the earth to the heaven & again it desends to the earth and receives the force of things superior & inferior.
9. By this means you shall have the glory of the whole world & thereby all obscurity shall fly from you.
10. Its force is above all force, for it vanquishes every subtle thing & penetrates every solid thing.
11a. So was the world created.
12. From this are & do come admirable adaptations where of the means (or process) is here in this.
13. Hence I am called Hermes Trismegist, having the three parts of the philosophy of the whole world.
14. That which I have said of the operation of the Sun is accomplished & ended.
Thanks random excerpt from Wikipedia!
I'm all for entertaining even wild and 'out there' ideas. But... if people are going to propose that there was some kind of genetic infusion into our species, then they had better be prepared to accept or refute some very clear and precise scientific data on exactly that question. That is to say, if it turns out that geneticists are able to link human dna to that of other creatures in clear and consistent ways, with no extraneous material whatsoever, than this theory would be dead in the water, no?
Too often I find that proponents of these kinds of ideas are so focused on their conclusions and not the actual facts, that they simply drop portions of their arguments that are disputed by real evidence, and alter their theory to better fit their conclusion! That's not science, that's not logic, that's not common sense. It's just hiding your head in the sand.
I'm not accusing anyone here of this behaviour, by the way, this is just a general observation I have made. Anyone ever read about the timecube??
timecube? nope, but it sounds intriguing.
i heard recently (not totally sure of my figures here, but...) that humans share something like 99.9% of DNA with chimps--far too much to allow for this bizzarre outerspace intervention in our development.
and AGAIN, those ideas, as i mentioned, contain a very anthropocentric view of the universe. the idea that us humans are sooooooo important that beings from other planets made long and dangerous voyages across space and time in order to intervene in our development. it suggest an evolutionary pyramid, with us as the peak of it. to that, i say bollocks.
blue whales communicate (possibly even addressing one another by individual NAME) across hundreds, and even thousands of miles of ocean--they enter a channel of water where the temp is conducive to long-distance travel of sound.
I don't favor
logic over non-logic
science over no-science
common sense over no-common sense
these types of judgements are relative and so being end up hindering the progression of the soul.
language is automatically prejudiced, skewed, endowed with more meaning than we might want it to have.
"canada", for example, is an arbitrary name for a culture/place/nation/whatever that has existed for thousands of years.
god bless canada.
and god bless the metis nation that is manisaskerta.
and god bless the nameless name which hath no name.
We Win.
Where are you Wolf boy? We need to jam
yeah, let's do it. today? label?
word
Post a Comment